Yes No Share to Facebook
Removal of Aircraft on Highway
Following an Emergency Landing As Per Section 187 of the Highway Traffic Act
If a Plane Lands On a Highway Because of An Emergency Who Is Responsible For Getting the Plane Off the Highway?
When An Aircraft Makes An Emergency Landing Upon a Highway the Pilot Is Legally Required to Have the Aircraft Removed As Soon As Reasonably Possible. If the Highway Will Be Used For a Take-Off Then Police Must Approve And Control Traffic and the Take-Off Must Be Performed By a Commercial Pilot and Be Other Than the Pilot That Made the Landing.
Understanding the Law About Removal of An Aircraft After An Emergency Landing
It is a very rare event; but does happen a few times per year, that an aircraft makes an emergency landing on a highway or roadway; and indeed, although without actual use of the highway, a plane did recently make an emergency landing next to Highway 404, a major multi-lane highway, in the Toronto area. When a plane or aircraft actually does an emergency landing upon a highway, the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8 prescribes mandates requiring, among other things, the prompt subsequent removal of the aircraft.
The Law
Following the an emergency landing of plane, or other aircraft, onto a highway, which includes various types of roadways as per the "highway" per the Highway Traffic Act, the plane, or other aircraft, must be removed as soon as is reasonably possible. Furthermore, the law states that if the removal of the plane, or other aircraft, will make use of the highway for a take-off, then a commercial pilot must perform the take-off and the commercial pilot must be someone other than the pilot who made the emergency landing. Also, as surely is common sense, a police force or police service must provide consent to using the highway for the take-off as well as providing traffic control. The Highway Traffic Act specifically states:
Aircraft on highways
Removal of aircraft from highway after emergency landing
187 (1) Where an aircraft has made an emergency landing on a highway, the pilot in command thereof, if he or she is physically capable, shall, as soon after landing as is reasonably possible, remove or cause it to be removed from the roadway.
Aircraft and movement along highway subject to Act
(2) Subject to subsection (3), no aircraft shall be driven or drawn along a highway unless the aircraft and the movement thereof comply with the provisions of this Act respecting vehicles and the movement thereof on a highway.
Aircraft take-off from highway
(3) Where an aircraft has landed on a highway because of an emergency related to the operation of the aircraft, the aircraft may take off from the highway provided,
(a) a licensed commercial pilot, not being the owner of the aircraft, who is qualified to fly that class and category of aircraft, and the pilot in command of the aircraft are both satisfied that the aircraft is airworthy and that there are no physical obstructions on or over the highway which would make such take-off unsafe;
(b) the pilot in command of the aircraft is satisfied that weather conditions are satisfactory for the purpose and that the minimum requirements are met under the visual flight rules established by the regulations made under the Aeronautics Act (Canada) or, if the flight is to be continued under instrument flight rules, that adequate arrangements can be made for obtaining a clearance from an air traffic control unit prior to entering instrument flight weather conditions;
(c) traffic control is provided by the appropriate police force; and
(d) the police force consents to the take-off.
Penalty
(4) Every person who contravenes this section is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $10,000.
No liability where good faith
(5) No proceeding for damages shall be instituted against a police force, police officer or pilot, for an act or an omission done or omitted to be done by it, him or her in respect of the subject-matter of subsection (3) where the force, officer or pilot was acting in good faith.
Penalty
Upon a finding of guilt for violating section 187(4) of the Highway Traffic Act a pilot may be fined up to ten thousand ($10,000) dollars which would also be subjected to the statutory victim surcharge as well as court cost.
Summary Comment
Although it happens very infrequently, when an aircraft makes an emergency landing upon a highway, the pilot who did the landing is required to arrange for removal of the aircraft as soon as reasonably possible. If the subsequent method of removing the aircraft involves use of the highway for a take-off, then various legal mandates apply.
Stephen Parker Legal Services is an affordable Fight Traffic Tickets Paralegal in:
NOTE: A considerable amount of inquiries related to “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” frequently indicate a requirement for prompt and effective legal assistance, rather than a particular professional designation. In Ontario, the same Law Society that governs lawyers also regulates licensed paralegals, who are permitted to represent clients in specific litigation scenarios. Their role is fundamentally centred around advocacy, legal assessment, and procedural expertise. Stephen Parker Legal Services provides legal representation in accordance with its licensed remit, focusing on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing efficient and beneficial outcomes for clients.